Of Algebra, Google and the Bible

Futzing around.

I know Google can solve math problems. But I was tinkering with Wolfram Alpha and comparing it with Google Search and I ran across the fact that WA can solve algebraic equations.

So I thought I’d see if Google could as well.

Spoiler alert: as far as I can tell, it can’t.

I typed in a completely arbitrary algebraic equation and Google brought up search results for sites and documents that contained that sequence of characters and similar ones. Not much help there.

So just to refresh my mind on what Google does with calculations, I entered this arbitrary expression:

43+12/9-14

The usual calculator image with the result (30.333333…) appeared as the first result. But I allowed my eye to scan below that expected result and was startled to find as the very next result, a reference to the Bible: “Matthew, chapter 12” from the site of the United States Conference of Bishops.

WTF?

I wondered what portion of the search term generated that result.

So I trimmed the search term to 43+12/9. Now the posts following the calculator result were engineering-like entries dealing with connectivity and other esoterica.

43+12/ led to…ready? No math result, of course, but the first entry was to Isaiah 43:12!

WTF, again?

Same result if I omit the slash, but in that case, I get the calculator result, too.

It turned out that the only way to get the original citation to Matthew without the full original search term was to trim it to 43+12/9-1.

I spent way too much time on this but it was really fascinating. I cannot easily decode the reasons that some of those mathematical formulas produce Biblical citations when entered in the Google Search bar. I’d love to understand it, though.

Giants Open Cactus League With Two Come-from-Behind Wins

Yep, Spring Training games mean nothing. Less than nothing. But, still….  The Giants opened the 2017 Cactus League with two come-from-behind victories over the Cincinnati Reds and the defending World Champion Chicago Cubs (still can’t believe that’s not an #alternativeFact).

Chris Marrero

On opening spring day, they entered the ninth inning trailing the Reds 4-3. Chris Marrero hit a 3-run walk-off  homer to give the G-Men a 6-4 victory. The next day, Saturday, the Cubs were in Scottsdale (Cubs were, however, split-squad). The Cubbies were up 3-0 in the fifth, but the Giants tied it in the bottom of the frame t=and then had a four-run sixth to put the game out of reach. The final: 8-6.

Then on Day 3, the Giants had a much easier day of it. They took the lead for good in the third and won it 9-5 pretty handily.

The good news is that the Giants’ offense has been performing well. Scoring 23 runs on 31 hits, which suggests timely hitting. The (not unexpected) bad news is that pitching has been a bit disappointing.

In Game 1, Madison Bumgarner gave up two runs in his only inning, for an ERA of 18.0. Then NRI Roberto Gomez came in and went one inning, giving up another run. Game 2 saw Matt Cain draw the start and toss two pretty nice innings. Ty Blach came on in the third and gave up another run over two innings but the biggest disappointment was Josh Osich, who yielded two earned runs in a single inning. Matt Moore started Sunday’s game and gave up one run in 1-⅓ innings of work. He gave way to Matt Reynolds, who didn’t help his cause any by giving up three earned runs in the remaining ⅔ of the second for an ERA of 40.50. So far, Manager Bruce Bochy and Pitching Coach Dave Righetti have taken a look at 23 different pitchers.

As I said at the beginning, these things tend to be meaningless until the last week or so of Spring Training, but hardened fans watch and fret over them anyway.

 

Behind the Plate for the G-Men: Posey Then Who?

So who’s going to be playing backup to the SF Giants’ indomitable  starting catcher, Buster Posey, this season?

SF Giants Catcher Buster Posey crouching behind home plate

SF Giants Catcher Buster Posey

After all, there can be no doubt at all that Posey will be the starter the vast majority of the games. He’s a rock solid performer, a fan favorite, a team leader, and it favorite of Coach  Bruce Bochy. The team has him under contract for the next several years (through 2021). His 2016 season was sterling despite sitting out 33 games for one reason or another. His batting line of .268/.362/.434 showed a bit of a drop off from the previous three seasons, but is still pretty respectable. Mainly he gets the nod behind the plate because the handles the Giants’ rotation with incredible insight and finesse.

But one of the biggest questions in Spring Training camp is will be his regular backup? During the office-season, the Giants picked up 33-year-old, 10 year veteran Nick Hundley. They signed him to a one-year, $2 million deal. Presumably he doesn’t get that money unless he makes the roster. That move was undoubtedly designed to hedge the teams bet on last year’s backup backstop, Trevor Brown, who was less than spectacular at the plate and whose defensive skills are still a bit behind where they need to be if he wants to be a major contributor to the team, would probably benefit from at least starting 2017 in AAA ball where he’d be an everyday catcher rather than sitting around waiting for the rare turn to spell Posey.

SF Backup Catcher Candidate Rick Hundley

SF Backup Catcher Candidate Rick Hundley

Statistically, though, Hundley seems a bit poorer risk. Offensively, in 79 games as a Rockie last season, he hit .266/.320/.439. Those are comparable to Posey’s numbers. Defensively, Hundley was guilty of seven errors, six of which were throwing miscues, allowed eight passed balls, and caught just nine of 66 attempted base thieves. His overall fielding percentage was .988.

Brown played 19 fewer games (60) and ended with an anemic batting line (.237/.283/.364). Defensively, he was a good bit better than Hundley (probably because of his relative youth at 25) committed only two errors, allowed just four passed balls and caught nine of 40 stealing attempts. His fielding percentage was .993.

I’m predicting Hundley starts the season at No. 2, but will be benched or reduced to a pinch hitting role by the All-Star Break when Brown is brought back up.

Bochy likes to carry three catchers if he can. He has four non-roster invitee catchers in camp: Tim Federowicz, Aramis Garcia, Josmil Pinto, and Matt Winn. None of them looks ready for the Bigs but Spring Training has a way of doing tricky stuff with up-and-coming young talent. But of the four, if they send Brown down, Winn could be a good bet to be on the Opening Day roster. He hits for power (13 HR, 49 RBI in 95 games with the Class A Augusta Green Jackets. Still, a jump from A to the majors? Highly unlikely.

If Bochy decides to keep both Hundley and Brown in town, it will be because the latter can also play the infield, at least first and second base. In fact, he began his career at second. That kind of flexibility is important to a strategic coach like the Boch. (I promise not to overuse the poetic pun.)

 

 

 

I Have a New Blogging Place!

For the past few months I’ve been working with Job One for Humanity, a non-profit dedicated to slowing and stopping global warming. I’m their (volunteer) Director of Strategic Communications. My first big project for them has been helping them to position and market a new book called Climageddon (CLIMate ArmaGEDDON…get it?).

We have a plan that nobody has tried before to get the governments of the world to join together to combat global warming within the 10 years our founder, Lawrence Wollersheim, who is also the author of the book, has determined we have. If we fail to do that job, the climate will cross a series of increasingly dire tipping points as a result of which all living things on Planet Earth — yes, including humanity — will be subject to a major extinction event.

Put more simply, failure will end the Grand Experiment of human life on planet Earth.

I’ve read the book. Trust me. Things are much worse than anyone’s telling us. Other climate models that precede Wollersheim’s new meta-systemic approach are always underestimating the scope and overestimating the time frame of advancing climate catastrophe.

So what’s this got to do with my new blog?

I’ve decided to play the role of the Cock-Eyed Optimist on the Job One for Humanity executive management team. To that end, I’ve started a new blog (you can read it here) called the “Global Warming Cockeyed Optimist Blog.” In it I will be posting regularly news and information from the front lines of Climageddon that offers hope, possibility, and the occasional spiritual take on the catastrophe. My commitment is to make this new blog act as a sort of vaccination against the barrage of bad news that must inevitably be understood by all of us who love Planet Earth and Humankind.

I hope you’ll give the new blog a try. And let me know — in comments there or here — your thoughts on the subject. We’re all in this together, you know, because “There’s Only One Of Us Here”.

I Have a New Blogging Place!

For the past few months I’ve been working with Job One for Humanity, a non-profit dedicated to slowing and stopping global warming. I’m their (volunteer) Director of Strategic Communications. My first big project for them has been helping them to position and market a new book called Climageddon (CLIMate ArmaGEDDON…get it?).

We have a plan that nobody has tried before to get the governments of the world to join together to combat global warming within the 10 years our founder, Lawrence Wollersheim, who is also the author of the book, has determined we have. If we fail to do that job, the climate will cross a series of increasingly dire tipping points as a result of which all living things on Planet Earth — yes, including humanity — will be subject to a major extinction event.

Put more simply, failure will end the Grand Experiment of human life on planet Earth.

I’ve read the book. Trust me. Things are much worse than anyone’s telling us. Other climate models that precede Wollersheim’s new meta-systemic approach are always underestimating the scope and overestimating the time frame of advancing climate catastrophe.

So what’s this got to do with my new blog?

I’ve decided to play the role of the Cock-Eyed Optimist on the Job One for Humanity executive management team. To that end, I’ve started a new blog (you can read it here) called the “Global Warming Cockeyed Optimist Blog.” In it I will be posting regularly news and information from the front lines of Climageddon that offers hope, possibility, and the occasional spiritual take on the catastrophe. My commitment is to make this new blog act as a sort of vaccination against the barrage of bad news that must inevitably be understood by all of us who love Planet Earth and Humankind.

I hope you’ll give the new blog a try. And let me know — in comments there or here — your thoughts on the subject. We’re all in this together, you know, because “There’s Only One Of Us Here”.

Giants Bullpen Gains Some Seasoning, But…

Just as Spring Training opened yesterday for the Giants in Scottsdale, the team announced the signing of relief pitcher David Hernandez, late of the D-Backs, to a one-year minor league contract.

Action shot of Giants' Reliever David Hernandez

Giants’ Reliever David Hernandez

Hernandez, who will turn 32 in May, is a borderline pitcher with only four years in the majors in a career that spans 10 years of bouncing around between the minors and the Big League. His career stats are not great. His FIP is 4.35, which is just a skosh below horrible, while his WHIP is a pretty respectable 1.34.

But — and here’s the real rub — this is another guy in the Giants’ pen who has had recent Tommy John surgery. In fact, he sat out all of 2014 with the problem and had a really mediocre 2015 season (4.74 FIP, 1.31 WHIP), then last season as a Phillie he maintained is dismal FIP (4.32) while slightly seeing his WHIP dip to 1.50.

So what does that mean? What can we surmise about a guy whose WHIP is consistently solid but whose FIP is pretty awful? Good question. I’m off studying it right now. Watch for a coming-soon post on this that will include a rundown of the Giants’ likely pitching lineup.

Go, Giants!

Pitchers & Catchers Report! Spring Training Starts! Now, About that Bullpen…

San Francisco Giants LogoHip, hip, hooray! Spring Training 2017 officially started today for the San Francisco Giants, with pitchers and catchers reporting to Scottsdale and slated for their first workouts tomorrow.

Spring Training games begin Feb. 24 for the G-Men.

Okay, enough celebrating already! What’s up with the bullpen this year?

Unarguably the Giants’ main Achilles’ Heel last season, the bullpen is going to have a pretty new look this time around. Two veterans — Sergio (Don’t-Ask-Him-To-Close) Romo and Santiago (Who Me?) Casilla —  have moved on to greener (or at least other) pastures and a third regular from 2016, Javier Lopez, has retired. He’ll be given a trial as a broadcaster in the KNBR booth for several games, filling in for Mike Krukow, who’s apparently having some health challenges. (Read more here.)

Manager Bruce Bochy likes to keep 12 pitchers on the roster and the starting five is pretty well set, so the focus now turns to the relief corps. It appears that Bochy is likely to stay with four of his most regular relievers from last season – George Kontos, Derek Law, Will Smith and Hunter Strickland. Plus there’s the exciting new addition, Mark Melancon. Here’s my first take on who to keep an eye on as good prospects to make the remainder of the 25-man roster (with a tip of the hat to Michael Saltzman over at Fansided for his good first pass at the entire crew in camp).

(As you read this piece, you’ll see that I rely heavily on two stats to evaluate pitching talent: WHIP (walks + hits per inning pitched) and FIP (Fielding Independent Pitching). That second one may be new to you. It’s a relatively new development in Sabermetrics (the scientific/mathematics of baseball in which I am renewing my knowledge and passion this season). It is designed to measure the effectiveness of a pitcher without the influence of defensive brilliance or ugliness. The league average for FIP last year, e.g., was 3.8, so anything less than that is good and anything above 4.7 is terrible. If you want to know more about FIP, all the gory details are at my favorite Sabermetrics site.)

Mark Melancon, New Closer

Of course, the big bullpen news of the off-season was the successful recruitment of Mark Melancon (pronounced muh-LAN-son), a 31-year-old, 10-year veteran major leaguer with a proven track record as a closer. He features a well-above-average cutter and a nasty curve and he has great stats for keeping the ball on the ground and therefore avoiding big innings. The Giants paid this guy an apparent record for a reliever contract: $62 million over four years. There’s a 40-60 probability that this will be a good long-term deal. The guy is over 30 and his velocity can only decline as his arm ages. But his career averages of 2.79 FIP and 1.04 FIP combined with a respectable 6-to-1 strikeout-to-walk ratio make him a decent bet. He’d better be better than good, though, or the Giants’ fans are going to take him to task for taking so much of their money. (Yeah, it’s our money, Mr. Baer!)

One of the most likely to make the roster in my view is Cory Gearrin. Not only are his pitching stats respectable, the guy doubles as a left-fielder! There was a point last year when Bochy brought in a pitcher to take over for Gearrin, sent him to left field, let the new pitcher (Lopez) come in to get one guy out (he walked the dude), and then moved Gearrin back to the mound. (See the video here.) For a guy with a strategic mind like Bochy, Gearrin’s going to be difficult to release. Last year, he succeeded in 19 of 23 save attempts and had a very strong WHIP of 1.16, a career best, and a FIP of 3.29, well under the league average.

Steven Okert  was on the roster last season for the Giants, making 16 appearances, over the course of which he compiled an average 3.16 FIP and a similarly average WHIP of 1.29. Okert started his career in 2007 and had a sterling start but was plagued by injuries early on. Still, he looked decent during the G-Men’s final run in 2016 and probably has banked a certain amount of cred with Bochy as a result.

A guy I like a good bit but who is on the cusp because of off-season knee surgery is Josh Osich. He had an amazing 2015 season but injuries kept him from being at his full potential last season. He had a better-than-average WHIP of 1.376, but his FIP was abysmal at 6.09. I suspect he’ll make the 25-man roster cut but he’ll have one foot out the door until Bochy gets a decent look at how his surgery worked.

Before he was injured while a Cubbie in 2014, Neil Ramirez had a pretty good career going. And statistically, he looks to have recovered nicely from that injury. So I’m making him one of my long shots to make the final roster. Over his eight-year career in the majors (with three teams until last year when he was traded twice), he’s built a respectable FIP of 4.21 and a solid WHIP of 1.27. I just have a gut feeling about this guy; I like his attitude and I think that under the masterful tutelage of the best pitching coach in baseball, Dave Righetti, he could well flourish.

Matt Reynolds will likely make the cut even though he’s not quite even an average MLB pitcher. Last season with the Giants, he had a whopping FIP of 4.65 and an equally horrible WHIP of 2.00. So why do I think he makes the cut? Two reasons: first, the field is pretty thin (yeah, not great news), and Reynolds’ record with the Rockies and the Diamondbacks was a good bit better than he showed the Giants in 2016. So they may see hope for the future. Plus, he has good knowledge of NL West hitters.

A possible dark horse to make the cut is Kraig Sitton. You’ve likely never heard of him; he’s been in the minors now for six seasons and, at 28, he’s probably getting nearly his last shot at the Show. But for the Mariners’ AAA club last year, he did a good job, racking up a 1.14 WHIP and an FIP of 3.58, both of which put him in the above-average category.

So if we assume that George Kontos, Derek Law, Mark Melancon, Will Smith and Hunter Strickland all have cinched jobs, and if Boch goes with a 12-man pitching roster this year, this list is my tentative prediction for who makes the final 25-man roster. Interestingly, this gives the team an exact 50-50 split of lefties vs righties. I’m not sure that’s good in MLB today but that’s how it works out here.

Of course, as Spring Training develops, I’ll be keeping a really close eye on these guys and reporting back my revised thinking as real life intrudes on the fantasy of statistical projection.

I hope you like my stat-oriented stories this year. I’m back!

Giants’ 2017 Starting Rotation Isn’t as Solid as it Looks

As the start of Spring Training draws ever nearer, however slowly it seems, talk around the Hot Stove frequently turns to the Giants and their formidable-seeming starting rotation. No doubt that, statistically, the Orange-and-Black have an impressive row of starters that matches up well with any other team in baseball.

But if you scratch just below the surface you find potential flaws that could become yawning canyons into which the team could stumble, fall and not recover. Here’s my take.

Madison “Mad Bum” Bumgarner

No doubt the ace and lead starter of the crew, Madison “Mad Bum” Bumgarner, is everything he’s cracked up to be…and more. At the age of 27, this guy is just entering his prime and he’s already peeking around the curtain of the Holy of Holies within which reside the Greatest Pitchers of All Time. Bumgarner finished his fourth consecutive season with an earned run average under 3.00 with career highs in innings pitched (226 2/3) and strikeouts (251) last year. There doesn’t appear to be a flaw in this guy.

Johnny Cueto

Number 2 in the rotation, Johnny Cueto was a big surprise to most fans and sportswriters last season. Cueto went 18-5 with a 2.79 ERA, a 1.09 WHIP (walks plus hits per inning pitched) and 198 strikeouts in 219 2/3 innings. He also threw a career-high five complete games. So he should have a great 2017, right? Ah, but the fly in this particular ointment is is age: Cueto is 31 years old and, over the course of his 9-year career (8-1/2 with the Reds), he threw a huge number of innings (1,421 to be exact). How much more his arm has in it is a big question mark. Pitchers  hit their strides in the 26-28-year-old time frame and many are washed up by the time they’re 31.

Jeff Samardzija

At the third spot in the rotation is another 30-plus-year-old arm, hung on the lanky frame of one Jeff Samardzija, who’s 32. Over his nine-year career, he has thrown just 1,195 innings, more than 200 fewer than Cueto, so his arm probably isn’t quite as tired, but he’s clearly no spring chicken. Both he and Samardzija could go down with age-related injuries any time — or multiple times — this season. In his case, Samardzija would take with him a 2016 record of 12-11 with a 3.81 ERA, a 1.20 WHIP and 167 strikeouts in 203 1/3 innings. Not terribly impressive, but only a bit below par.

Matt Moore

The fourth starter, Matt Moore, like Mad Bum is 27 years old and he seems to have an immense talent. Last season’s record doesn’t really tell the whole story because it was his first year back after having Tommy John surgery on his throwing arm. A mid-season acquisition in 2016, Moore wound up with a 4.08 ERA, which is pretty weak for a guy who in 2013 was the AL MVP and Cy Young Award winner. His strikeout-to-walk ratio was a mediocre 2.16 and he showed flashes of poor control. But he doesn’t give up the long ball (0.9 homers per 9 innings last year). I’d say he’s a bit of a gamble. He could go either way, either returning in his prime fully recovered from the surgery and taking off like a rocket or fizzling and crashing into McCovey Cove.

Matt Cain

The final spot in the rotation belongs to Matt (OMG!) Cain, he of the 5.64 2016 ERA. (That wasn’t a fluke; remember his 2015 ERA was 5.79!) In nine full seasons with the Giants, Cain has thrown 1,961 innings, so his arm is probably more fatigued than Samardzija’s. Cain is also 32 years old (see above) and he’s not likely to get a lot of support and encouragement from fans unless he explodes out the gate, which is a tough assignment for a fifth starter. If Cain doesn’t cut it in Spring Training, the likely guy to replace him is the young, rocket-armed Ty Blach, who excited fans in the penultimate game of 2016 when he threw an eight-inning shutout at the Dodgers. He only pitched 17 innings but he had an impressive 1.06 ERA and he impressed a lot of folks. (Of course, you have to

Ty Blach

take into account a lot of factors: late in the season, first time seeing him throw at you, etc.) Still, the 26-year-old rookie seems ready, and if Cain falters, he could become a player.

So let’s review. The top of the rotation is solid. The next three guys are two tired-out 30-plus-year-olds and a guy coming off Tommy John surgery who wasn’t too impressive. And there’s the once-fabled Matt Cain.

Tell me again why this is one of the best starting rotations in the league?

Longing for President Bartlett

Washington Post political columnist Kathleen Parker — one of the keenest observers of the American political scene — brought a tear of nostalgia to my eyes this morning with this comment in a well-reasoned piece on Trump’s future:

A single episode of “The West Wing” would have taught Trump more about his new job than he seems to know — or care.

Ah, Jed, we hardly knew ye!

Read the entire column here. And if you’re not watching her regularly, and you’re a political kin to me, you should be.